Comparative health policy analysis

COMPARATIVE HEALTH POLICY ANALYSIS
May 31, 2019 Off All,

Paper details This is an assignment for postgraduate, I need a really professional writer have knowledge about policy analysis and public health. I want very high quality paper to get better score. The assignment is about comparing health policy among 2 countries. I chose alcohol policy (Laws) in Australia and USA. I will upload the instructions and there is video for the lecture and the professor was explaining the assignment, I want to writer to watch the video to know what exactly is the requirements. The video link https://drive.google.com/file/d/19ye4hVSUMcZ8IT7_Ed4uPhcX2t1SSv41/view?usp=sharing (she start talking about it at the second 1.40.00) She also require number of paragraph for each section in the essay, so do not write more than what she want. It is clear in the instruction. Do not go over 2200 or I will lose point and use the right APA6th citation style, she is very strict in grading so be focus and give detailed discussion. Minimum number or requirement references 13, you can use the class martial which I will upload. 1.5 space She explain the assignment as This is a systematically comparative policy analysis assignment. You need to be very clearest to what you are going to be focusing from the beginning (State exactly what is you are comparing). Are you going to be looking at 1. different countries or within the regions, 2. Different target group or same target group, 3. Are you comparing the models of particular policy instrument or 4. are you going to look at how have these countries addressed the same issue that have had and if they have the same issue how did they addressed it or 5. Are you going to look exactly the same instrument they have used and how (the way ) it actually was implemented if it was effective. You are going to be looking in overtime across different countries or in one time point. What you need to do: 1. Select criteria for comparison (e.g. particular aspect of the policy model/structure, and implementation and one or more outcomes), you can do 1. States of the law and before that make it clear if the issue was recognise. 2. Documentation analysis if one country raises it then the other country will be probably thinking should we do it as well. 3. The evidence that were used and the type of it. 4.desison making process, who is on the committees, independent not involving the key stakeholders who have high influence, while in Australia they include key stakeholders and they have a lot of influence in banning or restriction of uses. You can look at submission, government response but you have to identify what exactly you are comparing Keep in mind that you are comparing not describing one thing in each country and move to describe another thing then you find yourself not comparing, then the reader cannot be able to compare because the describing thing is not the same. So the read should be able to follow the comparison. 2. What came of that, what the contextual differences might explain why farmers from that group or chemicals company from that group or not. (e.g., cultural, demographic, historical, political, organisational, and/or financial systems arrangements). you will understand all of the above when you watch the video. Please Please You should be very clear on what you are comparing, you are not describing point. all comparing points should be relevant and clear. These link may be helpful USA: https://alcoholpolicy.niaaa.nih.gov/apis-policy-topics Australia: https://beta.health.gov.au/health-topics/alcohol/about-alcohol/alcohol-laws-in-australia