Explain notional lease. Simplify and clarify your explanation of the presumption of reality and omit references to other irrelevant judicial rules of interpretation

Following are some detailed comments for corrections provided by the professor. The difficulty is that much of your essay is poorly expressed and so understanding is not clearly demonstrated. I will make the following points: Q1. Reconsider Lambchops legal position. Ensure you refer to the relevant provisions of the Act in the context of each part of the question. If you refer to what an author has written, quote it accurately and make sure it is relevant to the point you are making. (This goes for the other questions too.) Do not mix up tenants liability with that of landlords. Q2 Clearly explain the relevance of the cases you cite and the legal rules they establish. Form clear conclusions as to each of the disputed matters. Omit irrelevant material about renewal procedure. Note that the premises are not residential. Q3 Explain notional lease. Simplify and clarify your explanation of the presumption of reality and omit references to other irrelevant judicial rules of interpretation. With reference to relevant case law form an accurate conclusion about the length of the notional lease. Your answer on the effect of the user is seriously defective and omits relevant cases that I have given you in my lecture on rent review. Assignment Details: In this part of the project you are required to settle some legal issues in certain leases of the subject property, New Oxford House, Barkers Pool, Sheffield, S1 1EQ. There is a question for each scenario. Answer all three questions. No specific form is set out for your answers but your argument and conclusions must be supported by reference to relevant cases and statutes. Cases must be properly referenced. Submission Details Your analysis of these questions should be in three essays of no more than 3000 words in length in total. (Note that each essay may be more or less than 1000 words). Each question needs to be explained in 1000 words with separate referencing in Harvard style for each question You should also submit a paper of up to 500 words explaining what changes you have made to your original assignment and explaining why you believe that these changes have improved the assignment.